Response to Phallic (Response #41)

Uploaded 2232 Days Ago by pretorious - - 19 comments

Photo © pretorious (Pretorious Photography) - flickr.com/photos/pretorious/
Unauthorized reproduction not permitted.

User Comments

Ana said 2232 days ago:

great shot, love the colours, not sure about the blur in the grass. but nice over all.

bioLarzen said 2232 days ago:

If only the post processing wasn't so heavy and oppressing here... The colors are a bit too unnatural for my taste and the selective blur hasn't got me especially either :(

On the other hand the subject is perfect :))

zulu said 2231 days ago:

Beautiful processing. Was the hole in the middle a coincidence?

jfka said 2231 days ago:

J'aime beaucoup la lumière qui éclaire le sujet principal.
je trouve dommage le flou sur l'herbe et les arbres.
je n'aime pas du tout la couleur du ciel.

Mais j'aime beaucoup le batiment.

zorilla said 2231 days ago:

Kitts Peak?

philippe said 2231 days ago:

Beautiful shot.

photografica said 2231 days ago:

This is fabulous. Very photoshopped, but fabulous nonetheless. Top marks.

pretorious said 2231 days ago:

Thank you folks.

zulu, yes, the hole was actually there already. :)

supersaturation said 2231 days ago:

hmmm the processing is pretty hardcore on this one.

photografica said 2230 days ago:

I think the processing suits this image. It's fabulously phallic. I'm really surprised it's not featured.

Hummingbird said 2229 days ago:

Since I almost took a shot of the same type object, highly relevant, and I like the shot. However, I am curious did the sky look that way or did you process it a lot?

Hummingbird said 2229 days ago:

Now I know the answer to my question, and Congratulations on your feature!

photografica said 2229 days ago:

Congrats. This definitely deserved a feature.

King said 2229 days ago:

My favorite part of this image is from the middle of the silo (including the green growth) to the top and I like the way the top of the silo separates in a supernaturally from the sky.

Congratulations.

pretorious said 2229 days ago:

Thank you all again. Yes it was processed a bit heavy, much heavier than most of my shots. At the time of processing I was after a sort of 3D look and in some sort of dream state appearance, I may have gone a little over the edge with it. Glad it made it here, thanks to all who voted.

Haiete said 2229 days ago:

A shot with a wonderful clarity and mix of vibrant color. The unrealistic look is a plus, but the the blur at the bottom of the tower makes the image look fake !

shane said 2227 days ago:

Not a fan of the processing at all. Looks horrid.

Bambi said 2226 days ago:

I love the color of the sky!!

You could comment on this photo if you were logged in.